THINK BIG
We called something as common sense which is the most uncommon in life. Do we realize and acknowledge this? I try to share some of my regular observations where I see certain obvious facts not realized by many of us. I want share my thoughts and get some insights from all of you.
Tuesday, October 10, 2017
Truth Beyond Imagination
Enablers are needed but Outcome is more Important
Nobel asked me if I want to have lunch. I asked what the best nearby Hotel. I wanted to go but quickly changed my mind after Nobel explained that I need to leave with my bag and enter again through the same process that I followed in the morning.
"We have a process for that as well. The team needs to fill this 7 page form and submit a business case for a phone call or a Printout or both. It will go through a robust approval process and we strictly follow the SLA of 10 days. The team are informed to followup only after these 10 days if they do not get any response."
"Without the test reports, even a dead body will not be touched by our doctors. We go by everything that is documented. We don't go by anything by apparent symptoms or verbal reports. This is the reason why our auditors don't find even one flaw in our Processes"
Yes I know why before Nobel clarified. Intellectual property and Process orientation.
But the fourth Receptionist stopped me "Sir, I need to check your bag before leaving"
"Just now I got it from your colleague what will be there other than what you already checked in the morning?"
Saturday, May 11, 2013
Being People Pro is not emotiona.l it is Leadership
Saturday, March 13, 2010
Favor only fools?
- A famous Indian counterpart of MNC used a logic to retrench good people because the other non-performing people (who are spared) cant survive if they are retrenched.
- In some backward states of India I feel secured in the train if I didnt buy ticket as they are the people who have preference. So being in inferior status always help the people?
- Naxalites who after killing many people, surrender and get special support from Government in the form of alloted land, special allowances and tickets to contest in the elections. Where as people like me never killed any one and do I get a 6 feet land atleast to bury me?
- In the Entrance Exams like Engineering and Medical, I heard better rank is given to the aged people when the scores are tied
- In some public sector comparny, I heard that a person who dropped from promotion in the last year is preferred over a meritorious person freshly due for promotion in that year
Everywhere the logic is that there is a party in sorry state and they need favor.
Is it a correct patter or do we need to recheck?
Sunday, March 7, 2010
3 Idiots is wonderful effort
Saturday, December 12, 2009
Leaders need to demonstrate what they say
Some of the simple observations I made indicate the need to question the authenticity of the leaders who talk more about these parameters. Many people like me are victims in many situations by simply talking these words as they are and unknowingly they become the target due to the hipocrocy of the same leaders. For example, if such hipocrite leader invites open criticism, you - like any innocent person provides some frank feedback about a few areas of improvement and the leader in general appreciates your frankness in public but will keep you in the hit list. You will never know about it in your circle and probably you share your excitement of the attention you received from the leader during the feedback and the kind of appreciation you received. You only realize the effect when you find yourself in the corner, when no leader picks you up for any role and you may be shocked when you come to know that all your managers were internally building negative opinion due to your "Open" feedback. But are'nt they claim to be encouraging such "Openness". The truth is any humanbeing likes Open feedback about anyone else but not about themselves. The same will be case when these pseuodo leaders talk about integrity, collaboration, and team spirit. Such leaders talk about collaboration when they are the beneficiaries. They talk about flat organization to others but worry about even mean things like possessing Cabins, Laptops, and Corporate Cell Phones.
If you ask for a title, you are a power savvy, but they cry for a cabin. And some of them write nasty exit letters when they leave the organization for reasons like not getting promotion or not liking to report to someone whom they believe as inferior.
I wanted to share a funny incident that really happened in one of my previous companies. There were two leaders always talking about team spirit and talking very low about hierarchical working style. Incidentally both of them were close allies to the Director of the company and came in to the organization through simple nomination rather than any recruitment process.
Whenever someone approaches them for concerns like Promotion, Hike, or good workplace they were eager to tell the associates about how low is their thinking and explain that why comes first than the individuals. While both of them have great differences among themselves they have this one common factor like many hypocrite leaders.
One leader came from Airforce Background (Wing Commander) and joined as a Consultant I want to call him as WC from now. Other leader is from Army (Colonel) and he too joined as a Consultant. I will call him Col.Both of them used to sit in adjacent cubicles. From the day one, the WC kept on talking low about the colonel because he as Wing Commander is higher ranked compared to Army Colonel (I dont understand why it matters when they are no longer colonels nor wing commanders!).
One fine morning, the colonel became the joint director (probably because he is more close to the director than his enemy :) and he desperately needed visitors place and the best place he found was the Cubicle of WC. When the WC went for a training, the highly enthusiastic Colonel got the cubicle vacated and made it as the visiting place for the Joint Director (for him). And he asked the Office assistant to move all the stuff of WC to another Cabin (better than Cubible ofcourse as per the standards of these leaders) and started using the visitor space.
When the WC came once to the office in the middle of training, he was surprised to see his place converted to visitor's place. He instead of checking with the right person (his enemy Col), enquired the office assistant on who did this and why. Poor office boy explained that it was the decision of Joint Director and showed him the wonderful work place (Cabin!!) elsewhere. Honestly that is much better place. But WC's Ego was hurt and he was probably upset simply because the movement happened without discussion.So he came at 8 AM in the week end (He never came to office before 10.30 AM in his life) and hurriedly moved all his stuff back to the original place. He asked the office boy to make all the changes and started sitting there even by ignoring the training. And I am afraid he was scared to go even to rest room as the place can be occupied by the respected Joint director again.
On the other hand, the Colonel came to office and noticed the change and started burning within himself. He called the boys and asked how it happened and was furious and fired the boys on why they obeyed WC's orders. He asked the boys to inform the Wing commander to vacate the space immediately shouting at them loudly ensuring that WC beside the cubicle can clearly hear what he said. But WC was quite determined and ignored all that and protected his space very well. the cold war went for 2,3 days and than the colonel sent a formal letter ordering the wing commander to vacate the place. The order dicated by him to the typist with as loud voice as possible and every word was clearly heard by WC. Still the typist typed the letter got it signed by COL and then circulated to Wing commander through internal dispatch process. It all took about a day while these two people were sitting side by side. However, the wing commander when received the order, tore it in to pieces and the eagerly watching colonel kept silent and continued to suffer from burning stomach.
Ultimately the Colonel talked to him and questioned him on how can a circular from Joint director can be ignored. Wing commander equally shouted and clearly communicated that he was ready to resign but can not vacate the work place. All juniors, office boys and even visitors had good entertainment on that day.
I do not want to elaborate on what happened later, because this is enough to explain how nastily can the socalled responsible and matured leaders behave for a work place. I wonder how these leaders have right to talk to any of their team members about some unknown terms like Professionalism, Integrity, Official protocol, commitment and other silly words that these people dont even understand.
I see some of my colleagues in the career who worried about their cabins, laptops and the company cell phones more than their life. There was one colleague who invited medical emergency when he was informed to vacate his cabin for accomodating a critical project team member.
I came across another leader who was desperate to have coffee but could not have it because the office boy was not available for 2 hours (For him, going to Coffee machine and getting a cup of coffee is not leadership. A new dimension ! )
I personally believe that a leader needs to first know how to be led, how to behave exemplary rather than making statements that he / she doesnt practice.
Why did I write this?
For some entertainment to myself :)
Sunday, December 6, 2009
Youth demonstrates only destructive unity?
Did they try to fight when several innocent people died due to twin bomb blasts in our state? Did they think of atleast knowing the truth when one individual allegedly eaten up crores of public money? How many of them tried to question the government on how the funds are getting utilized? Do they believe only mass attacks without really knowing why are they doing? Did they ever try to control rapidly increasing street dogs in the city?
If they cant show civic sense in many day to day issues, how can they claim to be representing a cause about which they have no clue on how can it eliminate the problems. I am sure if I pick one of them and ask them to explain he or she wont have any proper answer. All they knew is moving with sticks and doing some thing sensational without sense.
I feel pity of the parents who might not be having control on their kids.
I again repeat, I am not expressing my opinion on the issue and as long as people fight with clarity on why they are doing, and if it is performed properly there is no objection at all. If people are clear about the issue, whatever the incidents we hear and watch in TV would not occur at all.
Youth is powerful and with such strength, it can do wonders to improve the society. If this energy is not channelized properly the results are most disasterous.
Sunday, November 29, 2009
Media more harmful than terrorists?
Probably I am inviting debatable discussion but feel this is a valid topic to discuss and do something about it. There was a time when Rajiv Gandhi used to say "Hamen Dekhna Hai" while the viewers who had no choice but watching Door Darshan were saying "Hamen Nahi Dekhna Hai". That was when the proposal to introduce Prashara Bharathi Bill was well received by many. I was one of them because I also was seeing only SAARC meetings and Rajiv's speches in DD News and nothing else.
But I and if I believe many of my friends need to swallow the words and accept that whatever bad Door Darshan may be, but the TV Channels needed the kind of governance existing in DD.
The recent 26/11 shows there were many supporters in India who helped the terrorists for killing innocents in Mumbai. I sincerely feel more than any one, it was media which helped them the max. They showed everything of rescue and attacking operations through TV. While Commandoes were trying to interact through Signals, the media was very busy to show every moment of their's to improve their viewership and helping the terrorist supporters know what is happening. If this is called the strength of Media it is more harmful than Terrorism and more mean than Prostitution.
I remember an incident in Mumbai when two girls were abused by a mob. they must have felt quite humiliated after that unfortunate incident but more humiliation happened when the Media competed to show the snaps and provide as much description as possible to explain how they were ill treated. While they justify masking the faces of girls their spouses were still in the photos clearly telling everyone in the world about who were the vicitims of this shameful action. And media tried to justify they are doing their duty in taking the snaps in another incident when a specific community was beaten up on roads. Can they do the same if the person getting beaten is their relative? And what if the person dies? With this justification they may even do the coverage of killing of any person in the name of "doing duty".
Recently Politician was physically attacked by some barbarious people. More than that, I hated the people who were desparately positioning their cameras to capture how badly the person was being hit. Given a choice I may prefer to punish these people rather than those who really hit the politician. The fact that these people really wait in the sensitive area for incidents to capture and contribute to increase the viewership of their TV Channels. What if some of these people are hit by me and if I ask the cameramen to cover the incident?
What happened in the first week of new year 2010? Some channels discussed toomuch about a rumour published in a Russian magazine and discussed to such extent that a company's properties were attacked. The attacks were definitely not from the public and were doctored by a few antisocial groups. But the TV Channels are the triggers to these incidents right?
Media manipulates the news. I remember the incident in US when some of my friends stayed 1 year after a terrorist- who involved in 911 incident vacated the same house. The Police wanted to investigate and hearing that the Media met a few neibours and asked about our friends. Unfortunately my friends vacated the house 1 week before 911 incident to another house in the next lane of the same colony. When Media asked, the neibors said that these people used to talk in strange language and a couple of times, they heard the word White House. However one of their colleague was also interviewed by Media during that time, when he revealed that the people actually were his colleagues and that they were staying only in the next lane. And you know, Media omitted this piece of information when telecast because the whoe excitement will be lost. It created terror to my friends and they were worried for several days till they got confirmation from Police that their investigation is routine and they knew the terrorist left long time back. All the Police wanted to verify was to see if any evidence be available from this house.
But what is the contribution of media in this episode? What if some mad crowd attacked these people with such bad input from Media?
I feel there needs to be more governance on Media especially the News Channels. the kind of provoking and violent movies shown in other channels only come next to New channels.
Sunday, November 15, 2009
PMI Conference: A National Event
the curtain raiser was a great presentation following our National Anthem "Vande Matharam". The vision about 2020 talked about some of the great facts about India. India is the country who invented the ZERO, the numbering system. We are the country where World's cheapest cars was made through indigenous innovation. The Session also mentioned about Mahatma Gandhi one of the greatest leaders ever born in this universe. And with many foreign delegates present, there was no hesitation to be proud about our country, including singing both the national anthems, unlike some pseuodo intellectuals who were worried about foreigners getting embarassed about we singing our National Anthem.
Patriotism is something that is the right of all of us. And demonstrating it doesnt need any special forum and any hesitation. Thats where I saluted the event.
While we have our own issues like high population, poverty, lack of education while most of them depending on many others, we are still united and determined to improve. Identifying project management as one of the important driver for the development of this country is very good point and is something to work on.
Personally I feel, the root cause is Population which urges the people to go for short cuts in wherever they needed to compete among toomany players. Thats where the corruption starts. And thats where people ask for reservations without real education. When more people live in less space lot of resources needed to be shared but the urge for survival forces burglary. In addition, the health issues comeup as toomuch population cant assure hygene.
HOWEVER, project management being order of life, some of the issues can be overcome. For example, if I plan my travel properly I dont need to bribe the Ticket Collector for a berth in the train. It also saves you a lot of costs which you may need to pay as premiums while doing the things in the last minute. Cost Management- part of the Project Management can help you improve your reserves and use them in right place. A good quality avoids bad investments and more value for less money in short time (as there will be no rework).
I have seen costs being shot up in events like marriages, just because Project management techniques were not applied.
I will definitely be part of this initiative of cascading the PM culture everywhere. I know it is difficult but not impossible.
Sunday, November 8, 2009
What is our Social Responsibility?
Should we speak about Yedyurappa's political instability and the unfortunate killing of US Soldiers?
I didnt know what are the norms set by her school for such events, but guess the news must cover the categories like political, technical and sports etc.
I still wanted to be a bit eccentric as many people know.
I asked her to downplay the news item (as given in NDTV) of Yedyurappa who stated that he was forced to ditch some loyalists in the process of establishing stability in Government. I asked her to read it somewhat like the Crisis in Karnataka ends as Chief Minister made an assuring statement. In similar way, I asked her to read the news in AP in the lines like Congress is now united and want to work for win in Greater Hyderabad.
Than, in the sports section I asked her to highlight the success of Viswanathan Anand and Sachin emphasizing that Sky is the limit for performance.
I also asked her to mention Mistry's innovative Product Sixth Sense under technology. In addition, I asked her to include the miracle baby survived with heart outside body.
The reason why I wanted to spend more time is to ensure the discussions will be more healthy. There will be lot of hurting incidents that keep happening. While there are many reasons for that, one of the major cause in my opinion is the broughtup and lack of healthy thinking.
If you have two pieces of information like "innovation like Sixth Sense" and a hurting incident, I prefer to share the first one and ignore the second. I feel the media also must do the same. As long as they give more space of headlines for bad events, these events keep happening. Whereas many good and motivating events are not attracting the attention of us.
I want my kids and her friends to have the healthy habit of discussing good topics and improve hopes on change towards optimism.
Not sure how many of you agree.